[This entry was written some months back, before I started as an "Intervention Specialist," but I think it is worth including even now. Some day perhaps I'll have enough of these descriptions to publish a small book.]
This past week we had final exams, so the class schedule was a little different than usual. We had two two-hour period in the morning, and school let out at 12:45. I subbed for a teacher who was ill, and who had already given her students their final the week before. I had nothing to give them to do, so I let them do whatever they wanted to, as long as they were orderly and reasonably quiet. I put a suggested list of activities on the board: Finish any work they still had for this class, do homework for other classes, read, talk, listen to their ipods. On Wednesday, Thursday and Friday I had two classes each day, all of them different students from the others.
As for the fact that the students had all been given their finals the week before, I can only conclude that the teacher had planned to take this time off and wasn't really ill. Maybe I am wrong, but I think much of the time the students spent in these classes was a waste.
However, my impression of this teacher, even without meeting her, is quite favorable. As a substitute teacher, one can walk into any regular teacher's classroom and tell what kind of teacher they are.
In this room, there were a large number of posters made up with various scientific data and information on them that students would need for problem-solving. There was a large poster telling the students that they were expected to aim at a goal of 80% correct MINIMUM. But most important, there was a lot of material on the walls and shelves that made it clear she held her students accountable.
For instance, there was a bookshelf containing good quality loose-leaf notebooks, one for each students, containing every quiz and test the student had taken. I was forced to compare this with a collection of notebooks I found in another teacher's classroom last year where the notebooks were all torn and dirty, and where some students had entered a few of their assignments and others had done a more comprehensive job of the same. Particularly interesting this past week were wall charts with every student's name and every test and quiz, and with a colored star next to each quiz, except for a few that the students had not taken. This was visible evidence of how the student was doing, something they could see to remind them of the quality of their efforts. When I discussed the classroom with a friend who knows the teacher, I was told that this was typical of her conscientious approach. She wanted everything from the students she expected of them, and she made sure she got it.
I also got the impression from the students that most were quite bright. One student said 80% were intelligent, and there was an element of about 20% who didn't care about their grades.
All in all, I could see that this teacher was doing an excellent job, even if she wasn't there for a few days.
I encountered three interesting students in her classes, and I'll describe them for you.
This past week we had final exams, so the class schedule was a little different than usual. We had two two-hour period in the morning, and school let out at 12:45. I subbed for a teacher who was ill, and who had already given her students their final the week before. I had nothing to give them to do, so I let them do whatever they wanted to, as long as they were orderly and reasonably quiet. I put a suggested list of activities on the board: Finish any work they still had for this class, do homework for other classes, read, talk, listen to their ipods. On Wednesday, Thursday and Friday I had two classes each day, all of them different students from the others.
As for the fact that the students had all been given their finals the week before, I can only conclude that the teacher had planned to take this time off and wasn't really ill. Maybe I am wrong, but I think much of the time the students spent in these classes was a waste.
However, my impression of this teacher, even without meeting her, is quite favorable. As a substitute teacher, one can walk into any regular teacher's classroom and tell what kind of teacher they are.
In this room, there were a large number of posters made up with various scientific data and information on them that students would need for problem-solving. There was a large poster telling the students that they were expected to aim at a goal of 80% correct MINIMUM. But most important, there was a lot of material on the walls and shelves that made it clear she held her students accountable.
For instance, there was a bookshelf containing good quality loose-leaf notebooks, one for each students, containing every quiz and test the student had taken. I was forced to compare this with a collection of notebooks I found in another teacher's classroom last year where the notebooks were all torn and dirty, and where some students had entered a few of their assignments and others had done a more comprehensive job of the same. Particularly interesting this past week were wall charts with every student's name and every test and quiz, and with a colored star next to each quiz, except for a few that the students had not taken. This was visible evidence of how the student was doing, something they could see to remind them of the quality of their efforts. When I discussed the classroom with a friend who knows the teacher, I was told that this was typical of her conscientious approach. She wanted everything from the students she expected of them, and she made sure she got it.
I also got the impression from the students that most were quite bright. One student said 80% were intelligent, and there was an element of about 20% who didn't care about their grades.
All in all, I could see that this teacher was doing an excellent job, even if she wasn't there for a few days.
I encountered three interesting students in her classes, and I'll describe them for you.